India is not starting from zero. Programs such as PM Surya Ghar, residential subsidies, net-metering/net-billing arrangements, and digital application processes have already created a foundation for rooftop solar. The next step is to make the economics and customer experience sufficiently simple and predictable that rooftop solar increasingly grows because it saves consumers money, rather than primarily because the government subsidizes it.
The United States provides a useful example. Millions of American households and businesses have invested in rooftop solar using a combination of falling equipment costs, financing, tax incentives and arrangements that compensate customers for electricity exported to the grid. The U.S. Department of Energy describes rooftop solar economics in terms of electricity-bill savings, financing and compensation for surplus generation—the same factors that ultimately determine whether Indian consumers will adopt rooftop solar at scale.
California demonstrates the potential at large scale. The California Energy Commission reported that rooftop solar generation increased roughly tenfold between 2012 and 2022, reaching more than 24,000 GWh in 2022.
Australia provides another strong example of widespread rooftop-solar adoption, showing that distributed generation can become a significant part of a country’s electricity system.
India can build on these experiences while designing its own model: simple approvals, affordable financing, predictable grid connection and fair compensation for surplus electricity.
With India’s abundant sunlight, enormous number of rooftops and growing electricity demand, the opportunity is particularly large. Every economically viable rooftop installation can lower the owner’s electricity purchases, generate power close to where it is consumed and reduce the need for additional land for large solar projects.
The long-term objective should be simple: rooftop solar should become an investment households and businesses choose because the economics make sense—not because they need a government subsidy to make it worthwhile.
I like the U.S./California example more than Australia alone for India We Deserve because it demonstrates the combination you’re proposing: private ownership + financing + grid connection + compensation for excess generation + consumer economics.
Leave a Reply